Skip to content

TechEmPower Benchmarks #62

Answered by gi0baro
cirospaciari asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

@cirospaciari that sound a good "marketing strategy", but I'm not a big fan of wasting computing resources.
IMHO "platforms" like granian should just be tested in isolation, as it is comparable only with other servers, not frameworks.

For instance: if RPS of uvicorn vs granian produce a ∂R, then whatever framework you might test will just have the same ∂R comparing it running with uvicorn or granian.
I would prefer to see some "rationalisation" on TechEmpower banchmarks, starting with having a clean gunicorn implementation, so we can test ASGI and WSGI in "plain mode". Then we can just demonstrate the performance of the server implementation, while the final RPS of the framework will be j…

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by cirospaciari
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants