Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider splitting @Config, @ConfigDefault, and Task to a separate artifact, such as embulk-util-config-task #31

Open
dmikurube opened this issue Aug 20, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@dmikurube
Copy link
Member

Some other util librarires sometimes want to prepare a predefined Task interface, but they have to depend on the entire embulk-util-config to do that. The dependency involves Jackson collaterally -- which takes developers closer to the dependency hell.

If another util library can only depend on @Config, @ConfigDefault, and Task, it'd be helpful.

@dmikurube dmikurube changed the title Consider splitting @Config, @ConfigDefault, and Task to a separate artifact, such as embulk-util-config-task Consider splitting @Config, @ConfigDefault, and Task to a separate artifact, such as embulk-util-config-task Aug 20, 2021
@dmikurube
Copy link
Member Author

dmikurube commented Aug 20, 2021

For Java modularity, they may have to be in a separate Java package: such as package org.embulk.util.config.task. Therefore, embulk-util-config has to be able to process both org.embulk.util.config.Task and org.embulk.util.config.task.Task at the same time.

org.embulk.util.config.Task may be just @Deprecated, though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant