Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Voting on Features #5

Open
ejmr opened this issue Jul 24, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Voting on Features #5

ejmr opened this issue Jul 24, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@ejmr
Copy link

ejmr commented Jul 24, 2018

This is related to issue #2 for creating a wishlist. Does anyone here have experience using FeatHub? If so, I would greatly appreciate any opinions on it. For people like myself who have never used it, how does @emacs-php feel about potentially using FeatHub as a way to help prioritize features for PHP Mode and all related projects?

@ejmr ejmr added the question Further information is requested label Jul 24, 2018
@zonuexe
Copy link
Member

zonuexe commented Jul 25, 2018

@ejmr
Thanks for the suggestion. I have imported php-suite into FeatHub.
https://feathub.com/emacs-php/php-suite

I may not be able to realize all the requests, but I would like to know the demand of users.

Feature Requests

zonuexe added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2018
GitHub-Issue: #5

refs #5
@zonuexe zonuexe self-assigned this Jul 25, 2018
@zonuexe
Copy link
Member

zonuexe commented Jul 25, 2018

I do not seem to be able to see badges from my environment. If it becomes visible after tomorrow, it applies to other projects as well.

@ejmr
Copy link
Author

ejmr commented Jul 25, 2018

@zonuexe

I may not be able to realize all the requests, but I would like to know the demand of the users.

I knew you would be a great maintainer, and that statement proves it. I think that I am going to try to contribute again---I've decide I woud like to publish more code before I die sometime in the next eighteen months. And one of the major reasons I am compelled to contribute once again is because of your talent as a manatiner.

PHP Mode is in great hands, and I couldn't be happier with your work.

--ejmr

@cyrialize
Copy link

@zonuexe You're the best man, I love how much you've contributed to the state of PHP on Emacs. Emacs has made me get into open source, but it's stuff like PHP-suite that encourages me to master elisp.

@ejmr
Copy link
Author

ejmr commented Jul 25, 2018

@jonnycyr

Yeah, creating @emacs-php and moving multiple PHP modules for GNU Emacs into one place might be the best thing @zonuexe has done yet. It is certainly a fantastic idea which I never thought of once during my six years as the maintainer. I love how quickly Usami as the maintainer organized everything.

--ejmr

ejmr pushed a commit to emacs-php/php-mode that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2018
This patch updates both READMEs with a mention of the official
FeatHub page for the GNU Emacs PHP Suite.  It is highly likely that
users will continue to request features via GitHub itself.  However,
since we discussed using FeatHub (see link below) we need to let users
know that it exists.  If we do not then, obviously, no one will use it.

The changes do not describe exactly *how* users should make requests
through FeatHub because we currently have no defined workflow
involving FeatHub.  In fact, it is not even certain that we will
end up using FeatHub at all; eventually we may very well prefer that
users continue to make feature requests through GitHub's mechanisms.
But we cannot accurately judge the merits of FeatHub if no one is
aware it even exists.

Therefore this patch is a small step towards helping us decide on
the best way to collect user feedback, particularly with regard to
new features people want to see in PHP Mode and its related projects.

See-also: emacs-php/php-suite#5
Signed-off-by: Eric James Michael Ritz <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants