Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/9.0] Update dependencies from dotnet/emsdk #108910

Merged

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot commented Oct 15, 2024

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/emsdk

  • Subscription: f85f62c8-5e7d-4706-1003-08dcbc30275f
  • Build: 20241017.2
  • Date Produced: October 17, 2024 12:31:33 PM UTC
  • Commit: 5054dd35a56010d8f6232408e56e31ad8ccc987a
  • Branch: refs/heads/release/9.0

…15.4

Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.emsdk , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100 , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100.Transport
 From Version 9.0.0-rtm.24515.1 -> To Version 9.0.0-rtm.24515.4
…17.2

Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.emsdk , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100 , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100.Transport
 From Version 9.0.0-rtm.24515.4 -> To Version 9.0.0-rtm.24517.2
@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Oct 17, 2024

@carlossanlop Merge if this is good to go.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

There are two host related failures I had not seen before and look related to stable branding. @NikolaMilosavljevic can you please take a look?

@carlossanlop carlossanlop added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Oct 17, 2024
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

@agocke @steveisok can you please help investigate the failures in host-related content in the installer subset? It's a couple of new failures I had not seen before and BuildAnalysis did not tag them to an existing issue.

https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/108910/checks?check_run_id=31686024128

cc @vitek-karas and @VSadov but they're out for the day.

@agocke
Copy link
Member

agocke commented Oct 17, 2024

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

/ba-g The failure seems to indicate that 9.0.0 is expected but 9.0.0-ci is encountered. So the product is fine, but we need to adjust the version that is used in PRs, so that -ci is removed when the branch is stabilized.

I opened this issue to track the failure and unblock the build: #108994

@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit 776c015 into release/9.0 Oct 17, 2024
151 of 162 checks passed
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the darc-release/9.0-c2be55cb-490b-43b6-8ca2-762b75f83161 branch October 17, 2024 19:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants