You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reading said document and trying to wrap my head around what this sentence means to say:
" The public Thread interface available to managed code intentionally hides the details of the underlying native threads because Managed threads are not necessarily mapped to a single native thread (and may not be mapped to a native thread at all) [...] "
Does it mean to say:
" The public Thread interface available to managed code intentionally hides the details of the underlying native threads because managed threads at some point in the future might be re-designed to map themselves to MORE than one (M:N) native thread (but bare in mind that at the present moment the CLR only allows 1:max-1 mapping) "
Is that the correct way to interpret the original phrase? Thank you in advance.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/docs/design/coreclr/botr/threading.md
Reading said document and trying to wrap my head around what this sentence means to say:
" The public Thread interface available to managed code intentionally hides the details of the underlying native threads because Managed threads are not necessarily mapped to a single native thread (and may not be mapped to a native thread at all) [...] "
Does it mean to say:
" The public Thread interface available to managed code intentionally hides the details of the underlying native threads because managed threads at some point in the future might be re-designed to map themselves to MORE than one (M:N) native thread (but bare in mind that at the present moment the CLR only allows 1:max-1 mapping) "
Is that the correct way to interpret the original phrase? Thank you in advance.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions