We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cue version
67f9dfa9
Yes (v0.10.0)
exec cue vet x.cue env CUE_EXPERIMENT=evalv3 exec cue vet x.cue -- x.cue -- import "struct" #foo: struct.MinFields(1) & { run?: string }
Passing test.
> exec cue vet x.cue > env CUE_EXPERIMENT=evalv3 > exec cue vet x.cue [stderr] #foo: invalid value {run?:string} (does not satisfy struct.MinFields(1)): len(fields) < MinFields(1) (0 < 1): ./x.cue:3:7 ./x.cue:3:24 [exit status 1] FAIL: /tmp/y.txtar:3: unexpected command failure
The vet should not fail with a definition that could have more fields in it later.
vet
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
What version of CUE are you using (
cue version
)?Does this issue reproduce with the latest stable release?
Yes (v0.10.0)
What did you do?
What did you expect to see?
Passing test.
What did you see instead?
The
vet
should not fail with a definition that could have more fields in it later.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: