Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

higher resolution videos? #6

Open
yibeichan opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

higher resolution videos? #6

yibeichan opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@yibeichan
Copy link

@bpinsard Hello, the current stimuli have a resolution of 480x720, which is too low for some analyses I need to do. I understand that the resolution fits the fMRI screen. I was just wondering whether you have higher-resolution videos available.

@bpinsard
Copy link
Contributor

This is the native NTSC resolution from the dvd, not the MRI screen. Even if you get a BluRay the limiting factor will be the resolution it was originally released on, this is an old TV show!! You can also see de-interlacing artifacts when there are large motion. I am curious about what analysis the resolution is limiting for? Also, in the movie10 dataset, the stimuli are from BluRay so higher res.

@yibeichan
Copy link
Author

i see i see, i want to identify each character's face (not face detection, which is fine). I cut the movie into pictures by frame (and second), which caused a lot of blurring that made this identification task harder. Would you happen to have some better suggestions? Does your lab try face identification on this?

@bpinsard
Copy link
Contributor

I understand, this is indeed a very interesting type of annotations, we have not attempted that yet.
Are you using something like https://github.com/psychoinformaticslab/pliers or other existing models?
Tagging @MarieStLaurent here, as she has been working on other type of annotations of video stimuli.

@yibeichan
Copy link
Author

I didn't use pliers but tried fine-tuning yolov9 with annotated pictures. Fine-tuning performance was okay, but the results were not satisfying... then I came up with some engineering solutions as much as I could think about. Still not as good as expected. I talked to Alejandro about it yesterday; he also said that it would be hard to get higher accuracy (given what I want).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants