You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A time series of acquired voltage data from extracellular recordings ....
(bold mine)
Maybe it is OK to write NIDQ as ElectricalSeries because the units are volts but what seems odd to me is that we are also writing the channels in the electrodes table.
I feel this should not be the case?
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
h-mayorquin
changed the title
[Discussion] Should NIDQ channels be treated like ElectricalSeries
[Discussion] Should NIDQ channels be treated like ElectricalSeries?
Aug 8, 2024
From a discussion with @bendichter about examples where we want to extend a column in the electrodes table.
While working on #985 I realize the that we are writing the nidq as an ElectricalSeries:
Reading the docs in the schema it seems that NIDQ does not really fit there:
https://github.com/NeurodataWithoutBorders/nwb-schema/blob/63ac845b2e1afdf6fc79466c1feafdd34538bb10/core/nwb.ecephys.yaml#L1-L7
Quoting:
(bold mine)
Maybe it is OK to write NIDQ as ElectricalSeries because the units are volts but what seems odd to me is that we are also writing the channels in the electrodes table.
I feel this should not be the case?
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: