Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PROPOSAL] A generic implementation for object store #41

Open
s-vinay opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

[PROPOSAL] A generic implementation for object store #41

s-vinay opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Inprogress

Comments

@s-vinay
Copy link

s-vinay commented Mar 29, 2024

This is a proposal request to have a generic implementation of object store such that irrespective of blob store or s3 or any other in future, developers will only be exposed to common methods to upload, download, list or delete.

We did a similar implementation covering both Azure blob and AWS S3 for now. But that was only specific to using object store as a plugin (not along with this broader implementation of having attachments). It makes sense to merge it here if it also makes sense for you.

Would you like to have a look at that repository? And once it make sense overall, I can request for a merge of the implementation with the necessary changes.

@RamIndia
Copy link
Contributor

RamIndia commented Apr 2, 2024

@s-vinay We can have a look at repo, can you provide the link here? let me know if call make sense, we can set up one!

@RamIndia RamIndia self-assigned this Apr 2, 2024
@RamIndia RamIndia added Inprogress enhancement New feature or request labels Apr 2, 2024
@s-vinay
Copy link
Author

s-vinay commented Apr 3, 2024

Thanks @RamIndia. I have invited into our private repo, please have a look. We are also open for a call, let us know once you had your first observations.

@m-hesse
Copy link

m-hesse commented May 3, 2024

Hi @s-vinay and @RamIndia, I'm interested in a several integration based on cap-js/attachments.
To prevent double work, i would like to jump in to the add-in development.
Any possibility to onboard me?

@s-vinay
Copy link
Author

s-vinay commented May 5, 2024

Sure @m-hesse. Not sure what onboarding means in this context but you can write to me on my personal ID [email protected] and we can get connected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Inprogress
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants