-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gyromagnetic_anomaly #34
Comments
the magnetic moment \mu here is not already defined for arbitrary particles in the package; should it be? |
Having some trouble getting the magnetic moments from NIST to load; once I figure it out I have functions to generate the g factors and gyromagnetic anomalies ready to go |
Magnetic moments for all the subatomic particles are implemented; is there a preferred way to get the overall magnetic moment for an arbitrary charge state of an atom? |
I do not know about this. I imagine the presence of the
electrons quite complicates matters. So much so that
I would avoid this for now. If we have an expert (I can
ask Des) then we might move forward on atomic nuclei
that are not fully stripped.
… On Sep 20, 2024, at 06:38, Alex Coxe ***@***.***> wrote:
Magnetic moments for all the subatomic particles are implemented; is there a preferred way to get the overall magnetic moment for an arbitrary charge state of an atom?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#34 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACXTUHFXX7USKTANQ2WUKOTZXQJLNAVCNFSM6AAAAABJJKPLQKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNRTGY2DCNZQGA>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
|
Suggested names:
gyromagnetic_anomaly
- For (g_spin-2)/2g_spin
- For 2*m * mu / (q * S) where m is the particle mass and mu is the magnetic moment.g_nuclear
- For 2* m_p / (e * S) where m_p is the proton mass.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: