Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

solo6110: severe signal leak between channels #22

Open
tetherit opened this issue Dec 29, 2011 · 6 comments
Open

solo6110: severe signal leak between channels #22

tetherit opened this issue Dec 29, 2011 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@tetherit
Copy link

I tried latest git compiled today (2011-12-29) and video from a single channel was pretty much perfect (woo!).

However if I try to record from multiple video devices with bc-record, this is the results I get:

http://itstar.co.uk/20111229_bluecherry/

There is severe signal leak between channels and it's impossible to watch if recording from more than 1 channel :(

Any ideas?

@benmcollins
Copy link
Contributor

Did you try the branch called "wip" or did you use the "master" branch?

@tetherit
Copy link
Author

It seems the problem is much reduced if I comment out set_osd in bc_record.c and in a quick test just now the picture quality is nearly perfect using the "wip" branch!

But now strangely I get "Failure in dqbuf" trying to read from /dev/video2 - the other video devices appear to work correctly, hmmm

@curtishall
Copy link
Member

Is this still occurring with the latest driver (2.4.0)?

@ihewitt
Copy link

ihewitt commented Apr 4, 2013

Just wanted to add I'm seeing the same issue on current git solo driver, commenting out the set_osd code resolves the issue.

@ghost ghost assigned ismaell Apr 4, 2013
@ismaell
Copy link
Contributor

ismaell commented Apr 18, 2014

Related to #19.

@ismaell
Copy link
Contributor

ismaell commented May 18, 2014

#19 has been fixed in master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants