Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WARP scanner not working as expected #120

Open
KatanaO opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

WARP scanner not working as expected #120

KatanaO opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@KatanaO
Copy link

KatanaO commented May 24, 2024

Version number
1.2.1
and also older ones

I just find internal scanner doesnt work properly, then i add --endpoint [a working ip:port that i had before and its working on my ISP-mkh] in command and everything is OK. i try other flag and command [-4 , --rtt , ...] in auto scan line but they made no change in result.
Auto-scan for endpoint needs to be improved.

And also in 1.2.1 version after run in gool or cfon mode "stuff' and "ca.psiphon.PsiphonTunnel.tunnel-core' sub-folders are not created, while they were made in 1.1.3 version

@abbasudo
Copy link

@KatanaO Stuff is no longer used in the new version. more details in #80

@abbasudo
Copy link

@KatanaO how can i find a working ip:port for my ISP?

@KatanaO
Copy link
Author

KatanaO commented May 24, 2024

@KatanaO how can i find a working ip:port for my ISP?

They are results of Warp-ip-scanners or The others (shared by people on tg channels, X , etc.). i used 2-3 of them in wg connection from 1-2 years ago till now. my new scan results (with warp-ip-scanner) dont work, and i'm confused a little about why and how one ip:port works or not on different ISPs. by the way i got the working ip:port by accident :(

@markpash markpash changed the title 2 notes WARP scanner not working as expected May 25, 2024
@markpash
Copy link
Member

The interesting thing about that is that the WARP scanner built inside of this project is working fine! It is able to successfully handshake with WARP IPs, but then the wireguard code fails to handshake! So either I need to improve the scanner to be the same as the wireguard code, or improve the wireguard code to be more like the scanner. 😆

@Amir2367
Copy link

Amir2367 commented May 30, 2024

The interesting thing about that is that the WARP scanner built inside of this project is working fine! It is able to successfully handshake with WARP IPs, but then the wireguard code fails to handshake! So either I need to improve the scanner to be the same as the wireguard code, or improve the wireguard code to be more like the scanner. 😆

The reason for these errors is that the scanner has a very serious problem and cannot detect the correct IP and port, finally it can detect the correct IP once out of every 10 scans and the proxy mode is activated.

To solve this problem, I scan the IP and port with Peyman's scanner and manually add them like this.

./warp-plus -e ip:port
This manual method makes the connection much more difficult.

  1. The IP and port do not work for more than one day in the first mobile and shatel and mci,
    and the new IP and port must be replaced.

  2. connection steps will be much longer

  3. It is better to replace another scanner to solve this problem from the root.

Screenshot_2024-05-30-22-16-45-827_com termux

Screenshot_2024-05-30-22-28-14-874_com termux

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants