Want to confirm logic in liquidity range example

[yankev]

Hi, so on this line: https://github.com/atiselsts/uniswap-v3-liquidity-math/blob/master/subgraph-liquidity-range-example.py#L161
it seems that you're counting liquidity for token1 (token y) when the price is below the lower tick of the current range, however from your document: https://atiselsts.github.io/pdfs/uniswap-v3-liquidity-math.pdf, it seems that the liquidity should all be in token 0 (token x) (scenario 1, on page 2).
Is there a reason why it's swapped around that I'm missing?

[yankev]

oh sorry nvm, I may have confused tick for the current tick price.

[atiselsts]

I see. In that code tick is the loop variable that goes from min_tick to max_tick, not the current price tick!