Use 5 star rating on papers to guide readers

[bvssvni]

I think some papers contain ideas that are much more important than others. Some papers are useless/wrong. The way it is represented now makes it difficult to know.

By using a 5 star rating on papers, it might be easier to narrow down the material and process it more efficiently. The rating could also give ideas of what kind of research might be fruitful in the future.

1. Useless/wrong
2. Irrelevant, or badly written
3. Interesting but not practical
4. Good, or nicely written, or practical
5. Might be incomplete or badly written, or too narrow, but important for other ideas to build on

A 5/5 paper is very likely to be some idea so important that you never can cover the material or explore completely, so it will feel incomplete. There will also be things that are not quite well understood about it.