Determine if MVP requires a user to select a district

[carlsonem]

Background
What should we consider when addressing this issue?

Acceptance criteria

• A determination is made if a user is required to select a district

Tasks

• Get confirmation from pilot forest if they require district information for MVP

[aQuib]

The list of pilot forests who provided one district and ranger for permit is located here (see excel sheet 'FS2400-1 Districts').

[aQuib]

All pilot forests has agreed to provide one district and one FS ranger for the FS2400-1 except for Chattahoochee-Oconee (still awaiting feedback).

However, George-Washington Jefferson NF would like to use the supervisor office as the district (which is not listed in TIM). @bboddiger - Would this be problematic for NRM reporting?

cc. @smahmudFS @mwreiss

[bboddiger]

This needs to be a district code/name for sending to FPFS and assigning a proclaimed unit, so the Supervisors office won’t work. Let’s regroup on this and think about the path forward a little bit. As subbing in for product owner, I need to get caught up on what decision making process has been to this point. Let’s talk. Thanks, beth From: aQuib Sylvester <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 12:41 PM To: USDAForestService/USFS-timber-permitting <[email protected]> Cc: Boddiger, Beth -FS <[email protected]>; Mention <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [USDAForestService/USFS-timber-permitting] Determine if MVP requires a user to select a district (#198) All pilot forests has agreed to provide one district and one FS ranger for the FS2400-1 except for Chattahoochee-Oconee (still awaiting feedback). However, George-Washington Jefferson NF would like to use the supervisor office as the district (which is not listed in TIM). @bboddiger<https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fbboddiger&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccfbaa28747ef44776f6708d86570606d%7Ced5b36e701ee4ebc867ee03cfa0d4697%7C0%7C0%7C637370880613421988&sdata=n9SPHeF%2FVSYO%2BjnjYpYuaNvCz9lgPcyEa2sXCW30JHc%3D&reserved=0> - Would this be problematic for NRM reporting? cc. @smahmudFS<https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FsmahmudFS&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccfbaa28747ef44776f6708d86570606d%7Ced5b36e701ee4ebc867ee03cfa0d4697%7C0%7C0%7C637370880613421988&sdata=HVNrNJNPF0XZnZJkOUnMIxIZUFu72Tr07G%2B4dK24qqo%3D&reserved=0> @mwreiss<https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmwreiss&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccfbaa28747ef44776f6708d86570606d%7Ced5b36e701ee4ebc867ee03cfa0d4697%7C0%7C0%7C637370880613431944&sdata=AeybvEGSRdz%2FfNiOb1358d0eYlEpoYgBy4ZbaFwS38w%3D&reserved=0> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FUSDAForestService%2FUSFS-timber-permitting%2Fissues%2F198%23issuecomment-701571941&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccfbaa28747ef44776f6708d86570606d%7Ced5b36e701ee4ebc867ee03cfa0d4697%7C0%7C0%7C637370880613431944&sdata=8bUJoRy04G%2BFILYx7vRx5AaDksD5cCwsCSWj2h1Q2cc%3D&reserved=0>, or unsubscribe<https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAN4LDRNMFS5PU7OPXICKP7TSIN3TXANCNFSM4R43KETQ&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccfbaa28747ef44776f6708d86570606d%7Ced5b36e701ee4ebc867ee03cfa0d4697%7C0%7C0%7C637370880613431944&sdata=BxvKSiZ22zfJ3tQhFObQLhiP7yPwRIUp9%2FcJtsBlWcQ%3D&reserved=0>. This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.

[aQuib]

The decision was made for user to select district. All details and requires associate with that selection is document in #156

[bboddiger]

There may be more than one district provided for forests that contain more than one proclaimed unit within their boundaries. Details found in #156