Node 20: errors produced by `reportTSError` are not serialised correctly when using ESM loader #2026

danrr · 2023-05-23T12:21:15Z

Search Terms

Node 20, reportTSError, error

Expected Behavior

When using the ts-node/esm loader with Node 18, TS errors are reported correctly. The file below when run with node --experimental-loader ts-node/esm test.ts

const a = (b: 1 | 2) => b + 1

console.log(a(3))

produces the following correct error:

TSError: ⨯ Unable to compile TypeScript:
test.ts:3:15 - error TS2345: Argument of type '3' is not assignable to parameter of type '1 | 2'.

3 console.log(a(3))
<stack trace>
  diagnosticCodes: [ 2345 ]

Actual Behavior

On Node 20, the error is serialised to only retain diagnosticCodes and no other info

node:internal/process/esm_loader:42
      internalBinding('errors').triggerUncaughtException(
                                ^
{ diagnosticCodes: [ 2345 ] }

Likely related to https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V20.md#custom-esm-loader-hooks-run-on-dedicated-thread

Steps to reproduce the problem

Run command above on Node 20

Minimal reproduction

TypeStrong/ts-node-repros#33

https://github.com/TypeStrong/ts-node-repros/actions/runs/5057165129/jobs/9075579140

Specifications

ts-node v10.9.1
node v18.16.0
TS compiler v5.0.4

and

ts-node v10.9.1
node v20.2.0
TS compiler v5.0.4
package.json:

{
  "type": "module",
}

Operating system and version: MacOS 13.4
If Windows, are you using WSL or WSL2?:

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

cspotcode · 2023-05-23T13:28:46Z

I think you're right, the errors are being marshalled from one thread to another, so our INSPECT_CUSTOM is being lost.

ts-node/src/index.ts

Lines 432 to 464 in 7af5c48

    
           /** 
        
            * TypeScript diagnostics error. 
        
            */ 
        
           export class TSError extends BaseError { 
        
             name = 'TSError'; 
        
             diagnosticText!: string; 
        
             diagnostics!: ReadonlyArray<_ts.Diagnostic>; 
        
             constructor( 
        
               diagnosticText: string, 
        
               public diagnosticCodes: number[], 
        
               diagnostics: ReadonlyArray<_ts.Diagnostic> = [] 
        
             ) { 
        
               super(`⨯ Unable to compile TypeScript:\n${diagnosticText}`); 
        
               Object.defineProperty(this, 'diagnosticText', { 
        
                 configurable: true, 
        
                 writable: true, 
        
                 value: diagnosticText, 
        
               }); 
        
               Object.defineProperty(this, 'diagnostics', { 
        
                 configurable: true, 
        
                 writable: true, 
        
                 value: diagnostics, 
        
               }); 
        
             } 
        
             /** 
        
              * @internal 
        
              */ 
        
             [INSPECT_CUSTOM]() { 
        
               return this.diagnosticText; 
        
             } 
        
           }

Can you think of a good solution here? Is there a way to rehydrate the errors on the main thread so that they're logged correctly?

As far as I remember, they errors are never "caught" per-se, they simply have a custom formatting. So when node prints them to stdout, they are formatted the way we want.

danrr · 2023-05-24T12:25:24Z

OK, I understand, so it's the correct exception, hence the { diagnosticCodes: [ 2345 ] } output but the diagnosticText is being lost in the serialisation of the exception.

I had a look at the code in https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/lib/internal/error_serdes.js and I think I see what's happening.

The if on line https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/lib/internal/error_serdes.js#LL119 is skipped as the type is [object Object], not [object Error].

The if on line https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/lib/internal/error_serdes.js#L137 is skipped because ObjectPrototypeHasOwnProperty(error, customInspectSymbol) returns false -- the check here is done using Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty but, because the error is created from TSError, the INSPECT_CUSTOM is a property of the prototype of the error, not of the error itself. .

This means it falls into the try block here https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/lib/internal/error_serdes.js#LL145 which only serialises the diagnosticCodes (as that's the only own property on the TSError).

The fallback on https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/lib/internal/error_serdes.js#LL150 actually serialises it correctly but it's never reached normally as the block above returns.

I tried to change TSError to move

  this[INSPECT_CUSTOM] = () => {
      return this.diagnosticText;
    }

to the constructor, which caused it to serialise correctly and deserialise to an object with the inspect output of TSError as its inspect output. BUT the output from node is now this:

node:internal/process/esm_loader:42
      internalBinding('errors').triggerUncaughtException(
                                ^
[Object: null prototype] {
  [Symbol(nodejs.util.inspect.custom)]: [Function: [nodejs.util.inspect.custom]]
}

from this line https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/lib/internal/process/esm_loader.js#L42.

I even put console.log("loadESM", err) on the line above the call to internalBinding('errors').triggerUncaughtException and that printed the TSError output correctly, so I'm not sure what is happening.

I tried to set process.setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback() but I think I ran into #2024.

Any idea what's happening with this?

azasypkin · 2023-06-24T11:16:59Z

Thanks for filing this issue! I just wanted to mention that it makes debugging the tests running with Node.js's Test Runner (node --loader=ts-node/esm --test ./src/tests.ts, from secutils-web-scraper) incredibly painful, as it is common to rely on errors while writing tests. One has to switch to Node.js 18 just to see the actual error.

danrr · 2023-07-02T21:46:52Z

@cspotcode serialisation has been fixed in the nightly version of Node. The problem is that internalBinding('errors').triggerUncaughtException( ignores Symbol(nodejs.util.inspect.custom) but with process.setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback(console.error) the type error info is shown again in the console.

danrr · 2023-07-07T13:02:41Z

@cspotcode Node 20.4 is out now with the serialisation fix in place. Could you please release a new version of ts-node so it can be used like this?

//logError.js
import { setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback } from "node:process"
setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback(console.log)

node --loader=ts-node/esm --import=./logError.js

Unless there's another way of getting this to work that doesn't require the fix in #2025.

Maikpwwq · 2023-08-31T15:22:44Z

I am using ts-node this way on Node 20 and works. Config ["type": "module"] in package.json, then update tsconfig.json to ts-node's ESM support and pass the loader flag to node in scripts, node --loader ts-node/esm ./index.ts. tsconfig.json:

{
  "compilerOptions": {
    "strict": true,
    "module": "ESNext", // ES2020
    "target": "ES2020",
    "moduleResolution": "Node",
    "lib": ["DOM", "DOM.Iterable", "ESNext"],
    "types": ["vite/client"],
    "jsx": "react-jsx",
    "skipLibCheck": true,
    "esModuleInterop": true,
    "allowSyntheticDefaultImports": true
  },
  "ts-node": {
    "experimentalSpecifierResolution": "node",
    "transpileOnly": true,
    "esm": true,
  }
}

brianjenkins94 · 2023-09-15T14:41:08Z

I am seeing this with:

$ npx ts-node -vvv
ts-node v10.9.1 C:\project\node_modules\ts-node
node v20.6.0
compiler v5.2.2 C:\project\node_modules\typescript\lib\typescript.js

And on Mac:

% npx ts-node -vvv
ts-node v10.9.1 /project/node_modules/ts-node
node v20.6.1
compiler v5.2.2 /project/node_modules/typescript/lib/typescript.js

Pyrolistical · 2023-09-18T20:30:50Z

Thanks @danrr.

This worked for me on node v20.6.1

//logError.js
import { setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback } from "node:process"
setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback(console.log)

Full command: node --test --no-warnings=ExperimentalWarning --loader ts-node/esm --import=./logError.js test-*.ts

Pyrolistical · 2023-09-20T20:04:00Z

Wait, that workaround only correctly logs out the error, but the test passes. How do we also fail the test?

gsimko · 2023-10-04T12:34:36Z

@Pyrolistical your solution doesn't work for me, I get the "Error [ERR_DOMAIN_CANNOT_SET_UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION_CAPTURE]: The domain module is in use, which is mutually exclusive with calling process.setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback()"

Would it be possible to log the error from reportTSError instead of just throwing it? In my case it didn't even produce the diagnosticCodes or a stack trace or even a line where the error occurred. The ts-node process just hang up and printed

Object: null prototype] {
  [Symbol(nodejs.util.inspect.custom)]: [Function: [nodejs.util.inspect.custom]]
}

It took some non-trivial amount of effort to figure that the problem is related to this bug report.

Pyrolistical · 2023-10-04T18:25:58Z

@gsimko i gave up trying to use ts-node/esm and just tsc the test code and ran it normally with node --test

alpharder · 2023-10-27T01:11:53Z

I also get this when any TSC error happens under the hood:

Restarting 'app.ts server:start'
(node:42858) ExperimentalWarning: `--experimental-loader` may be removed in the future; instead use `register()`:
--import 'data:text/javascript,import { register } from "node:module"; import { pathToFileURL } from "node:url"; register("ts-node/esm", pathToFileURL("./"));'
(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)

node:internal/process/esm_loader:40
      internalBinding('errors').triggerUncaughtException(
                                ^
[Object: null prototype] {
  [Symbol(nodejs.util.inspect.custom)]: [Function: [nodejs.util.inspect.custom]]
}

Node.js v21.1.0
Failed running 'app.ts server:start'

The command is

node --watch --loader ts-node/esm app.ts

ts-node v 10.9.1

alpharder · 2023-10-27T01:15:00Z

The world was not ready for ESM 7 years ago and isn't yet quite ready

Kagami · 2023-11-12T21:01:53Z

Took me about 20 minutes to come with this solution:

// package.json
"scripts": {
  "test": "TS_NODE_PROJECT=test/tsconfig.json node --test --import=./test/register.js test/**/*.spec.*"
},

// test/register.js
import { register } from "node:module";
import { pathToFileURL } from "node:url";
import { setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback } from "node:process";
setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback((err) => {
  console.error(err);
  process.exit(1);
});
register("ts-node/esm", pathToFileURL("./"));

// test/tsconfig.json
{
  "extends": "../tsconfig.json",
  "compilerOptions": {
    "allowImportingTsExtensions": true,
    "types": ["node"]
  }
}

// test/test.spec.ts
import test from "node:test";
import { deepStrictEqual } from "assert";

import { myfn } from "../lib/utils.ts";

test("test array", () => {
  deepStrictEqual(myfn([1, 2, 3]), [1, 2, 3]);
});

ESM + TypeScript + node is definitely quite tiresome combination 😅

ArmorDarks · 2023-11-13T16:21:41Z

@Kagami unfortunately it's not a solution for real applications, because you can easily land in this fatal error if nothing throws:

Error [ERR_DOMAIN_CALLBACK_NOT_AVAILABLE]: A callback was registered through process.setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback(), which is mutually exclusive with using the `domain` module

Kagami · 2023-11-13T16:27:29Z

I switched to https://github.com/swc-project/swc-node because imports without .ts extension doesn't work with ts-node.

// package.json
"scripts": {
  "test": "node --test --import=./test/register.js test/**/*.spec.*"
},

// test/register.js
import { register } from "node:module";
import { pathToFileURL } from "node:url";
register("@swc-node/register/esm", pathToFileURL("./"));

Much simpler and also faster. But I'm only using it to run tests...

alpharder · 2023-11-20T22:54:15Z

For anyone who just wants to see what the TSC errors are without any fanciness, here's how I patched ts-node's TSError impl:

class TSError extends Error {
    constructor(diagnosticText, diagnosticCodes, diagnostics = []) {
        super(`⨯ Unable to compile TypeScript:\n${diagnosticText}`);
        this.diagnosticCodes = diagnosticCodes;
        this.name = 'TSError';
        Object.defineProperty(this, 'diagnosticText', {
            configurable: true,
            writable: true,
            value: diagnosticText,
        });
        Object.defineProperty(this, 'diagnostics', {
            configurable: true,
            writable: true,
            value: diagnostics,
        });
    }
}

Now I can see the error:

node:internal/process/esm_loader:40
      internalBinding('errors').triggerUncaughtException(
                                ^

TSError: ⨯ Unable to compile TypeScript:
src/framework-extras/streaming-file-uploads/streaming-file-upload.model.ts(48,21): error TS2339: Property 'warning' does not exist on type 'LoggerInterface'.

You can use https://github.com/ds300/patch-package for replicating this workaround locally.

mogzol · 2023-11-22T01:49:07Z

Thanks @danrr.

This worked for me on node v20.6.1
//logError.js
import { setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback } from "node:process"
setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback(console.log)
Full command: node --test --no-warnings=ExperimentalWarning --loader ts-node/esm --import=./logError.js test-*.ts

Wait, that workaround only correctly logs out the error, but the test passes. How do we also fail the test?

Just doing process.exit(1) in the error handler seems to work for me:

// logError.js
setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback((error) => {
  console.error(error);
  process.exit(1);
});

karlhorky · 2023-11-24T11:36:00Z

For anyone who just wants to see what the TSC errors are without any fanciness, here's how I patched ts-node's TSError impl:

This is great, thanks for the patch, @alpharder !

Unfortunately, I couldn't get your patch working as-is.

Do you think that you could also:

Add the filename of the file you changed
Change the syntax highlighting on your code above to diff and then add - and + lines to the lines that have been removed and added? A bit nicer to be able to check the patch...

BenjaminGaymay · 2023-11-24T17:57:43Z

For anyone who just wants to see what the TSC errors are without any fanciness, here's how I patched ts-node's TSError impl:

This is great, thanks for the patch, @alpharder !

Unfortunately, I couldn't get your patch working as-is.

Do you think that you could also:

Add the filename of the file you changed

Change the syntax highlighting on your code above to diff and then add - and + lines to the lines that have been removed and added? A bit nicer to be able to check the patch...

After a few research in found the fix in "dist/index.js" l97, he replaced the whole TSError class.
That's a small win but is there an other fix we can make to get the error cleaner ?

karlhorky · 2023-11-24T21:35:28Z

After a few research in found the fix in "dist/index.js" l97, he replaced the whole TSError class

I also did this research already, but applying the patch the way it is above did not work. So it would be good to get specific instructions.

ArmorDarks · 2023-12-09T13:28:55Z

Put this patch in patches/ts-node+10.9.1.patch (you might need to correct the version in file name)

diff --git a/node_modules/ts-node/dist/index.js b/node_modules/ts-node/dist/index.js
index c03afbf..0370067 100644
--- a/node_modules/ts-node/dist/index.js
+++ b/node_modules/ts-node/dist/index.js
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ exports.DEFAULTS = {
/**
 * TypeScript diagnostics error.
 */
-class TSError extends make_error_1.BaseError {
+class TSError extends Error {
    constructor(diagnosticText, diagnosticCodes, diagnostics = []) {
        super(`⨯ Unable to compile TypeScript:\n${diagnosticText}`);
        this.diagnosticCodes = diagnosticCodes;
@@ -110,13 +110,8 @@ class TSError extends make_error_1.BaseError {
            value: diagnostics,
        });
    }
-    /**
-     * @internal
-     */
-    [exports.INSPECT_CUSTOM]() {
-        return this.diagnosticText;
-    }
}
+
exports.TSError = TSError;
const TS_NODE_SERVICE_BRAND = Symbol('TS_NODE_SERVICE_BRAND');
function register(serviceOrOpts) {

Add to package.json scripts this:
```
"postinstall": "npx patch-package"
```
It will auto-apply patch on npm install
Do npm istall. That's it, patch applied.

bennycode · 2023-12-29T10:22:26Z

I switched to https://github.com/swc-project/swc-node because imports without .ts extension doesn't work with ts-node.

I just tried node --loader @swc-node/register/esm ./src/start.ts. Instead of providing incorrect stack traces, it runs without performing typechecking. Do you know how to enable it?

Kagami · 2024-01-03T00:03:11Z

it runs without performing typechecking. Do you know how to enable it?

I believe it's by design. For my use case (unit tests) it's perfect. Also you can check types just by building TypeScript project with noEmit: true if needed. Although for some use cases ts-node might be actually better, not sure here.

gurpreetatwal · 2024-03-14T04:49:13Z

@Kagami unfortunately it's not a solution for real applications, because you can easily land in this fatal error if nothing throws:
Error [ERR_DOMAIN_CALLBACK_NOT_AVAILABLE]: A callback was registered through process.setUncaughtExceptionCaptureCallback(), which is mutually exclusive with using the `domain` module

@ArmorDarks you can use process.on('uncaughtException') to get the same behavior if your code is using the domain module.

e.g.

import process from 'node:process';

process.on('uncaughtException', function (err) {
  console.error(err);
  process.exit(1);
});

Nerdman4U · 2024-03-25T06:54:30Z

I had this error with node 21.7.1 instead of real error:

node:internal/process/esm_loader:34
      internalBinding('errors').triggerUncaughtException(
                                ^
[Object: null prototype] {
  [Symbol(nodejs.util.inspect.custom)]: [Function: [nodejs.util.inspect.custom]]
}

and i started to get correct error messages after adding this to tsconfig.json (found solution from this thread):

"transpileOnly": true,

kollein · 2024-04-10T03:55:27Z

I am using ts-node this way on Node 20 and works. Config ["type": "module"] in package.json, then update tsconfig.json to ts-node's ESM support and pass the loader flag to node in scripts, node --loader ts-node/esm ./index.ts. tsconfig.json:
{
  "compilerOptions": {
    "strict": true,
    "module": "ESNext", // ES2020
    "target": "ES2020",
    "moduleResolution": "Node",
    "lib": ["DOM", "DOM.Iterable", "ESNext"],
    "types": ["vite/client"],
    "jsx": "react-jsx",
    "skipLibCheck": true,
    "esModuleInterop": true,
    "allowSyntheticDefaultImports": true
  },
  "ts-node": {
    "experimentalSpecifierResolution": "node",
    "transpileOnly": true,
    "esm": true,
  }
}

Thanks, it works well with my custom loader too 👍

ert78gb · 2024-05-03T10:42:59Z

Hi All,

I have similar experience.
My setup is a mono-repo. There is a root ts-config.json and every package contains it owns ts-config.json. The packages extends the root ts-config.json.
The package that contains the ts script contains the following extension.

"ts-node": {
    "esm": true,
    "transpileOnly": true
  }

When I ran ./packages/package1/my-script.ts with node 18.17.1 then worked perfectly.
After I upgraded to 20.9.0 I got the following error.

node:internal/process/esm_loader:40
      internalBinding('errors').triggerUncaughtException(
                                ^
[Object: null prototype] {
  [Symbol(nodejs.util.inspect.custom)]: [Function: [nodejs.util.inspect.custom]]
}

I use the #!/usr/bin/env -S node --loader ts-node/esm --no-warnings=ExperimentalWarning shebang in the scripts.

I tried to figure it out what is the problem because only the node version changed.
If I run the my-script.ts in the packages/package1 folder then the script runs successfully.
If I run the script in the root folder of the repo then fails.

After that I moved the ts-node specific setup to the root ts-config.json and run the ./packages/package1/my-script.ts from the repo root works again. PR

I don't know what changed but looks like the ts-config resolver starts from the cwd instead of the script directory.

vladtreny · 2024-05-03T11:52:45Z

transpileOnly is not a solution, then what is the point of using typescript.

As for now, stick with node 19. Nothing to do.
20, 21 do not provide any must-have features.

ert78gb · 2024-05-03T12:46:12Z

transpileOnly is not the solution. I just wanted to share the ts-config.json resolving logic changed too.

lortonx · 2024-08-29T23:00:08Z

bump

danrr changed the title ~~Node 20: errors produced by reportTSError are not caught when using ESM loader~~ Node 20: errors produced by reportTSError are not serialised correctly when using ESM loader May 25, 2023

danrr mentioned this issue May 27, 2023

Node 20: errors with util.inspect.custom raised in loader thread not serialized/deserialized correctly nodejs/node#48207

Closed

bczhc mentioned this issue Nov 23, 2023

Error while running pnpm run schema with node v21 LibreService/my_rime#23

Closed

karlhorky mentioned this issue Nov 24, 2023

Cypress fails to start with Typescript ^5.3.2 when using extends in tsconfig.json cypress-io/cypress#28385

Closed

iambumblehead mentioned this issue Nov 25, 2023

troubleshoot test pipeline, recently failing iambumblehead/esmock#279

Merged

northword mentioned this issue Nov 28, 2023

从 xpi 包获取 id 和 description zotero-chinese/zotero-plugins#49

Merged

bennycode mentioned this issue Aug 30, 2024

fix: Replace tsimp with ts-node bennycode/ts-node-starter#679

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Node 20: errors produced by `reportTSError` are not serialised correctly when using ESM loader #2026

Node 20: errors produced by `reportTSError` are not serialised correctly when using ESM loader #2026

danrr commented May 23, 2023 •

edited

Loading

cspotcode commented May 23, 2023 •

edited

Loading

danrr commented May 24, 2023 •

edited

Loading

azasypkin commented Jun 24, 2023

danrr commented Jul 2, 2023

danrr commented Jul 7, 2023

Maikpwwq commented Aug 31, 2023

brianjenkins94 commented Sep 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading

Pyrolistical commented Sep 18, 2023 •

edited

Loading

Pyrolistical commented Sep 20, 2023

gsimko commented Oct 4, 2023

Pyrolistical commented Oct 4, 2023

alpharder commented Oct 27, 2023

alpharder commented Oct 27, 2023

Kagami commented Nov 12, 2023

ArmorDarks commented Nov 13, 2023

Kagami commented Nov 13, 2023

alpharder commented Nov 20, 2023

mogzol commented Nov 22, 2023

karlhorky commented Nov 24, 2023 •

edited

Loading

BenjaminGaymay commented Nov 24, 2023

karlhorky commented Nov 24, 2023

ArmorDarks commented Dec 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading

bennycode commented Dec 29, 2023

Kagami commented Jan 3, 2024

gurpreetatwal commented Mar 14, 2024

Nerdman4U commented Mar 25, 2024

kollein commented Apr 10, 2024

ert78gb commented May 3, 2024

vladtreny commented May 3, 2024

ert78gb commented May 3, 2024

lortonx commented Aug 29, 2024

Node 20: errors produced by reportTSError are not serialised correctly when using ESM loader #2026

Node 20: errors produced by reportTSError are not serialised correctly when using ESM loader #2026

Comments

danrr commented May 23, 2023 • edited Loading

Search Terms

Expected Behavior

Actual Behavior

Steps to reproduce the problem

Minimal reproduction

Specifications

cspotcode commented May 23, 2023 • edited Loading

danrr commented May 24, 2023 • edited Loading

azasypkin commented Jun 24, 2023

danrr commented Jul 2, 2023

danrr commented Jul 7, 2023

Maikpwwq commented Aug 31, 2023

brianjenkins94 commented Sep 15, 2023 • edited Loading

Pyrolistical commented Sep 18, 2023 • edited Loading

Pyrolistical commented Sep 20, 2023

gsimko commented Oct 4, 2023

Pyrolistical commented Oct 4, 2023

alpharder commented Oct 27, 2023

alpharder commented Oct 27, 2023

Kagami commented Nov 12, 2023

ArmorDarks commented Nov 13, 2023

Kagami commented Nov 13, 2023

alpharder commented Nov 20, 2023

mogzol commented Nov 22, 2023

karlhorky commented Nov 24, 2023 • edited Loading

BenjaminGaymay commented Nov 24, 2023

karlhorky commented Nov 24, 2023

ArmorDarks commented Dec 9, 2023 • edited Loading

bennycode commented Dec 29, 2023

Kagami commented Jan 3, 2024

gurpreetatwal commented Mar 14, 2024

Nerdman4U commented Mar 25, 2024

kollein commented Apr 10, 2024

ert78gb commented May 3, 2024

vladtreny commented May 3, 2024

ert78gb commented May 3, 2024

lortonx commented Aug 29, 2024

Node 20: errors produced by `reportTSError` are not serialised correctly when using ESM loader #2026

Node 20: errors produced by `reportTSError` are not serialised correctly when using ESM loader #2026

danrr commented May 23, 2023 •

edited

Loading

cspotcode commented May 23, 2023 •

edited

Loading

danrr commented May 24, 2023 •

edited

Loading

brianjenkins94 commented Sep 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading

Pyrolistical commented Sep 18, 2023 •

edited

Loading

karlhorky commented Nov 24, 2023 •

edited

Loading

ArmorDarks commented Dec 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading