[EPIC 1] Bundle proposal tx

[wtfsayo]

• Check whether det. address can be used in a bundler txn

[benedictvscriticus]

• bundler smart contract takes invoice address and uses it as receiver for the proposal
  • Is it possible to predict the deterministic address with the salt?
  • If we can predict the address and use it in a bundled transactions, then we would not need the bundler to create the invoice upfront.
• Alternate: take the transaction and create a deterministic address

[scottrepreneur]

Bundle these in the proposal txs instead

[benedictvscriticus]

Found a small vulnerability

• one creates an invoice and the second sends funds to the invoice
• If the invoice cannot be created deterministically, a malicious actor may substitute the invoice address with their own invoice.
  • In this case, the proposal would fail.
  • Rough UX and small vulnerability.
• We want to bundle the smart contracts instead.

[benedictvscriticus]

Are we able to access the execution transaction hash with the creation of the proposal? If so, we can find the address for funding and releasing funds.