Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorporate selfing #5

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 14, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Incorporate selfing #5

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 14, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

In plant populations, self-fertilization can be the dominant reproductive 
process. Does selfing 
change results from a diffusion-based analysis?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 6 Apr 2010 at 4:18

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

There are two potential issues.
1) Selfing may affect the variance effective population size, changing the 
interpretation of Ne results. More 
problematic, it might also change conversion of genetic units to physical 
units, since those are all in terms of 
Ne.
2) If the individuals sampled are not outbred, the frequency spectrum would be 
substantially distorted. For 
example, if all the sampled individuals were the direct result of 
self-fertilization, the number of singletons will 
be dramatically depressed.

Original comment by [email protected] on 6 Apr 2010 at 4:22

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

In regards to 1), Crow and Denniston (1988) _Evolution_ 42:482 suggests that 
selfing should *not change* the 
variance effective population size. (Comment after Eq. 19.)

Original comment by [email protected] on 6 Apr 2010 at 4:24

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant