Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Server using an existing ticket storage implementation #4

Open
juokaz opened this issue Sep 13, 2012 · 2 comments
Open

Server using an existing ticket storage implementation #4

juokaz opened this issue Sep 13, 2012 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@juokaz
Copy link

juokaz commented Sep 13, 2012

Summary

A server implementation that uses an existing ticket system such as Trac to store and retrieve tickets.

Requirements

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in IETF RFC 2119.

Specification

The server MUST support anyonymous and authenticated users. The server MUST NOT put additional constraints such as email address validation into place for anonymous users unless the underlying ticket system requires this.

The server MUST support retrieval and creation of tickets and comments.

The server MUST support closing and reopening and SHOULD support updating of tickets and comments by appropriately authorized users where supported by the underlying ticket system.

The server MUST support retrieval of information about users.

The server SHOULD support creation and updating of users.

The server SHOULD NOT discard unknown elements in requests upon serialization to the data store.

@caseysoftware
Copy link

Possible addition:
"The server SHOULD NOT discard unknown elements in requests upon serialization to the data store."

Source: #3

@dzuelke
Copy link
Member

dzuelke commented Sep 13, 2012

Done, thanks @caseysoftware

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants