Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make and publicise plans for childrens' day #76

Open
inglesp opened this issue May 2, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

Make and publicise plans for childrens' day #76

inglesp opened this issue May 2, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@inglesp
Copy link
Contributor

inglesp commented May 2, 2016

No description provided.

@MissPhilbin
Copy link

Current ideas for both teachers and children's day can be found here. Please request access if you need it.

@inglesp
Copy link
Contributor Author

inglesp commented Jun 13, 2016

I'm writing up a page for the website now.

Some questions:

  • What're we charging for tickets? Is £10/child too much? Last year they were £5/child but lots of people didn't turn up.
  • What age range are we going to be able to cater for?
  • How much of the Google document is confirmed?

@MissPhilbin
Copy link

  • I think £5 is a good amount, anymore and we risk alienating lower income families.
  • We should be able to cater for 8 to 18 year olds on the children's day. Groups to be accompanied by an adult at all times.
  • None of the children's day content is confirmed. Until we understand what equipment we have access to then we can not specify the max capacity of the workshops or even what content we can go ahead with. I'm awaiting a response from Pi-top etc.

@inglesp
Copy link
Contributor Author

inglesp commented Jun 13, 2016

OK!

Regarding pi-top, I know that @evildmp has been talking to Chantal there. Have you been involved in this conversation?

@MissPhilbin
Copy link

No I did not. RPF has good links with Jessie and they've helped us out at events before. @evildmp let me know if you rather we did not start another conversation with them.

@doismellburning
Copy link
Member

doismellburning commented Jun 13, 2016

From my perspective, the accessibility argument trumps everything; I'm happy with low, it looks like it'll cover what's necessary, and if not it won't be by much and that's something worth spending on.

(I do like the idea of charging more to discourage silent dropouts, but not at the cost of alienation)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants