-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Alcaeus and Sappho? #2682
Comments
hi @lcerrato for some reason when I was compiling our data entry list I mistakenly thought we had an edition of Sappho. There are three separate TLGs for their fragments, tlg0383 for Alcaeus, tlg0009 and then tlg1815 (for the two of them). Shall I add an edition to the First1K data entry picklist? |
Sure! |
So @lcerrato there are a few different ones in the catalog including one or two SLUB editions, any recommendations as to which one should go on the picklist? |
Not really, but perhaps: |
Hi Alison and Lisa,
The Sappho and Alcaeus texts with all the gaps filled in and without even brackets showing where — they’re not worth doing! They were left out of the 1st!K because it is restricted to texts preserved in mss., not fragments or papyri, I think because Neal and Chris didn’t want to deal with the problem of a text attested partly inside other texts (as quotations, like Sappho #1, in Longinus) as well as texts that are incomplete. I think that the CTS system has trouble with that, but I also think that they figured it out — Greg and dThomas K. will know. Anyhow, the best text of Sappho is the one by Eva Maria Vogt, and I may be wrong but I think it’s a Teubner. Worth checking. As for Alcaeus and other, there are Teubners that might be usable, like Anthologia Lyrica Graeca ed. E. Diehl, 1964. But I’m not sure what the rules are for them. Not sure this is helpful!!
Best, Lenny
PS Sorry for missing the meeting on Thursday — I just totally zoned out. Gotta get used to it again!!
… On Dec 19, 2022, at 2:16 PM, Alison Babeu ***@***.***> wrote:
There are a few different ones in the catalog including one or two SLUB editions, any recommendations as to which one should go on the picklist?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2682 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQXABDLII5OIUWT3COFJJ3WOCYCTANCNFSM6AAAAAATCXFO7U>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
|
Hi @lmuellner I'm not promoting inclusion if it means presenting a less than ideal text, but it's one of those things that comes up a lot. We do have the Greek Anthology in Perseus for Epigrams but this is not broken down by author, so the original email correspondent would have no way of finding these. I found nascent xml for all of the LCL Greek Lyric volumes but these were never published. So in those files there are some elemenary tags for the testimonia — interesting —:
|
@AlisonBabeu @lmuellner These are challenging files, though, so we may just have a very basic first pass. Thanks for adding your comments! |
hi @lcerrato and @lcerrato , the Greek Anthology on Perseus has always bothered me because I have all of the individual author and work level metadata in the catalog, its always been a question of how to link them. So I guess my question at this point is should I add an edition to the data entry list or no? And if so which one? The Voigt edition of Sappho was published in 1971, but I just gave up using Worldcat to find an edition (they have changed the interface), the Diehl edition of Alcaeus is a reprint of a much earlier series that is in the Perseus Catalog. |
Hi @AlisonBabeu I think it is this: https://archive.org/details/greeklyric0001unse/page/2/mode/2up |
Ok @lcerrato that is what I will put on the list. |
Have they been on any pick lists? I cannot find them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: