You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
the Kuhnz 1996 (study ID 7012) indicates a treatment of 0.06 mg IV at time 0h.
However, data points after 168 h show another sudden peak in the plasma concentration.
The paper indicates that this is because a second IV was performed, but this information is missing in the Times of Administration entry. I am still not entirely sure I understand the standard nomenclature correctly, but maybe sth like "0-168". Although, this would also not be entirely correct, because this would still miss the information that subjects were given "daily oral doses of 0.06 mg
ethinyloestradiol for 8 days" before the second IV was performed. So maybe it would be more clean to split the 2 profiles? The paper itself (fig 1) also shows them as two independent lines...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hello,
the Kuhnz 1996 (study ID 7012) indicates a treatment of 0.06 mg IV at time 0h.
However, data points after 168 h show another sudden peak in the plasma concentration.
The paper indicates that this is because a second IV was performed, but this information is missing in the Times of Administration entry. I am still not entirely sure I understand the standard nomenclature correctly, but maybe sth like "0-168". Although, this would also not be entirely correct, because this would still miss the information that subjects were given "daily oral doses of 0.06 mg
ethinyloestradiol for 8 days" before the second IV was performed. So maybe it would be more clean to split the 2 profiles? The paper itself (fig 1) also shows them as two independent lines...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: