Different class name convention than Boiler example

[OlivierVerhaegen]

Hi,

I noticed that the class names of my generated classes are different from the Boiler example.

I get:

    [System.CodeDom.Compiler.GeneratedCodeAttribute("Opc.Ua.ModelCompiler", "1.0.0.0")]
    public partial class CounterTypeState : BaseObjectState
    {
        #region Constructors
        /// <remarks />
        public CounterTypeState(NodeState parent) : base(parent)
        {
        }

        /// <remarks />
        protected override NodeId GetDefaultTypeDefinitionId(NamespaceTable namespaceUris)
        {
            return Opc.Ua.NodeId.Create(Test.ObjectTypes.CounterType, Test.Namespaces.Test, namespaceUris);
        }
...

While in the Boiler example the "Type" in the class name is omitted, only the ObjectTypes have the word "Type" in them

   [System.CodeDom.Compiler.GeneratedCodeAttribute("Opc.Ua.ModelCompiler", "1.0.0.0")]
    public partial class BoilerState : BaseObjectState
    {
        #region Constructors
        /// <remarks />
        public BoilerState(NodeState parent) : base(parent)
        {
        }

        /// <remarks />
        protected override NodeId GetDefaultTypeDefinitionId(NamespaceTable namespaceUris)
        {
            return Opc.Ua.NodeId.Create(Boiler.ObjectTypes.BoilerType, Boiler.Namespaces.Boiler, namespaceUris);
        }
...

Am I missing a setting to omit "Type" from the State classes?
I did generate from a NodeSet2.xml instead of a ...Design.xml.

Best regards,
Olivier

[opcfoundation-org]

No. When using a design file the tool strips the Type if the ClassName element is not set. There is no ClassName in a NodeSet2 file.

[OlivierVerhaegen]

So if there is no ClassName in a NodeSet2 file, shouldn't it omit "Type" by default? As this is done in absence of the ClassName element for ...Design.xml files?

Can I get the same result using a NodeSet2 File?

[opcfoundation-org]

The default is take BrowseName from the source and append 'State'
If it is model design file it strips the Type unless the ClassName specified then it uses the ClassName.
I guess the Type could be stripped but for NodeSets but it is not done now.

[OlivierVerhaegen]

Okay thank you for the explanation. Could this become an option in a future release?