You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I added this to the purpose instead of to each individual element changed (which would be 3 elements in this case). However, I did explicitly mention 'concept names, descriptions and DefinitionCodes' as (examples of) the elements I've changed.
In the case of an edited concept name, I've left the identity part of the mapping element alone, leading to:
Which you could say is incorrect, v1.0-2020 does not have a concept with the name 'VisualAcuity'. However, I did not want to add a separate v2.0-2021 mapping.
Is this the best way to mention this? Can the text be better? Or do we prefer adding guidance on the individual elements?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In #65 I incorporated serveral changes of the 2021-prepublication to fix issues in the 2020 version of the zib.
I edited the
purpose
of the profile by adding:I added this to the
purpose
instead of to each individual element changed (which would be 3 elements in this case). However, I did explicitly mention 'concept names, descriptions and DefinitionCodes' as (examples of) the elements I've changed.In the case of an edited concept name, I've left the
identity
part of themapping
element alone, leading to:Which you could say is incorrect, v1.0-2020 does not have a concept with the name 'VisualAcuity'. However, I did not want to add a separate v2.0-2021 mapping.
Is this the best way to mention this? Can the text be better? Or do we prefer adding guidance on the individual elements?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: