You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not exactly sure what (if anything) is wrong here but here's what just happened:
I had loaded dict v6.0.0.3 into my instance
I made a parcel and uploaded an sasf with that parcel and i saw USER_ commands getting highlighted red
i edited the dict to allow users and uploaded it successfully
the new dict didn't appear, probably because i didn't update the version number. i'm not sure if the upload was actually successful or if it got silently rejected
The sequences that had been loaded with the parcel that had v6.0.0.3 of the cmd dictionary were still linting the user commands as red
i uploaded a new cmd dict with a different version number, made a new parcel, deleted the old sequences and re-uploaded them, and the user commands are now appearing valid
I think the right behavior here would be to either 1) reject command dictionaries if there's one of the same version already uploaded, or 2) if someone uploads a new command dictionary that replaces one already uploaded, all the parcels should get updated to use the new version. I think option 2 is a little less appealing that one, we shouldn't really support command dictionaries that have the same versions but different content, but I'm throwing it out as an option.
Reproduction
I can re-produce this by uploading command dictionaries that have the same version but different content as a version that's already been uploaded.
Logs
No response
System Info
Chrome, on develop branch of aerie-ui and aerie backend +
Severity
Minor
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Checked for duplicates
No - I haven't checked
Is this a regression?
No - This is a new bug
Version
develop:15e1e94b
Describe the bug
Not exactly sure what (if anything) is wrong here but here's what just happened:
I think the right behavior here would be to either 1) reject command dictionaries if there's one of the same version already uploaded, or 2) if someone uploads a new command dictionary that replaces one already uploaded, all the parcels should get updated to use the new version. I think option 2 is a little less appealing that one, we shouldn't really support command dictionaries that have the same versions but different content, but I'm throwing it out as an option.
Reproduction
I can re-produce this by uploading command dictionaries that have the same version but different content as a version that's already been uploaded.
Logs
No response
System Info
Severity
Minor
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: