Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EXG only containing MVR with NEXG 0 doesn't work #2025

Open
tandreasr opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

EXG only containing MVR with NEXG 0 doesn't work #2025

tandreasr opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@tandreasr
Copy link

Hi,
while further testing the parallel capabilities of MF6 I found another error connected to splitting a model into subdomains.
Please have a look a the following screenshot:
_screenshot
The original model without any exchanges contained a Mover between two MAW wells located in Subdomain 3 (provider) and 10 (receiver) respectively.
When splitting the original model (test020_NT_EI from https://github.com/MODFLOW-USGS/modflow6-testmodels/tree/master/mf6)
into subdomains this mover obviously has to be moved into a new exchange (File exg_3_10.exg)
This exchange does contain the mover only, because no direct borders do exist between subdomain 3 and 10 - therefore NEXG 0.
This leads to the following error (serial and parallel mode):

ERROR REPORT:

  1. IDM unimplemented. StructArray::load_deferred_vector unsupported memtype.

My guess is that you haven't had such a case yet? (which in my opinion should be acceptible)
What do you think?
Here is the splitted model producing the error:
_usgs.zip

Best regards
Andreas

@tandreasr tandreasr added the bug label Sep 26, 2024
@mjr-deltares
Copy link
Contributor

Nice find! This is an interesting edge case that we will definitely further investigate. Will let you know what possible next steps are. Thanks for reporting @tandreasr

@mjr-deltares mjr-deltares self-assigned this Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants