Cruise prov:qualifiedAssociation Project [ prov:hadRole ??? ]

[ashepherd]

How are you guys describing the role a Project plays in association with a Cruise. from a funding standpoint? or ownership? This will be a blank node for me, but I do want to provide some more information about the association and its role. Just wanted to make sure I didn't miss an agreed upon notion here. Otherwise, I think i'll describe how the project serves as the funder (role) of the cruise.

[adamml]

Looking at the image for the cruise pattern on the repo we have a project is a PROV Agent and a PROV Activity; a cruise is a PROV Activity and a cruise is associated with a project via PROV isAssociatedWith,

Going back the other way, the options are likely to be:

• PROV wasInformedBy
• ARPFO statedPurpose
• Something from GeoLink?
• Create an new ODO property to link a project and a cruise (unless one exists already)

[ashepherd]

Ok, good. I was working off this diagram and realized BCO-DMO doesn’t describe the role a Project plays in a Cruise all that well, so I was curious how others were describing the Thing (role) that prov:hadRole points to from the Cruise > Project qualified Association. For now I’ll just leave it as a blank node, but I was thinking maybe I should put an rdfs:label on this to describe our intent.

On Feb 22, 2016, at 6:45 AM, Adam Leadbetter [email protected] wrote:

Looking at the image for the cruise pattern on the repo we have a project is a PROV Agent and a PROV Activity; a cruise is a PROV Activity and a cruise is associated with a project via PROV isAssociatedWith,

Going back the other way, the options are likely to be:

PROV wasInformedBy
ARPFO statedPurpose
Something from GeoLink?
Create an new ODO property to link a project and a cruise (unless one exists already)
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LinkedOceanData/smackdown-results/master/cruise/CruisePattern.png
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #1 (comment).