Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: LSDV-5289: Remove subquery from is_labeled update #4474

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2023

Conversation

triklozoid
Copy link
Contributor

PR fulfills these requirements

  • Commit message(s) and PR title follows the format [fix|feat|ci|chore|doc]: TICKET-ID: Short description of change made ex. fix: DEV-XXXX: Removed inconsistent code usage causing intermittent errors
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
  • Docs have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
  • Best efforts were made to ensure docs/code are concise and coherent (checked for spelling/grammatical errors, commented out code, debug logs etc.)
  • Self-reviewed and ran all changes on a local instance (for bug fixes/features)

Change has impacts in these area(s)

(check all that apply)

  • Product design
  • Backend (Database)
  • Backend (API)
  • Frontend

Describe the reason for change

(link to issue, supportive screenshots etc.)

What does this fix?

(if this is a bug fix)

What is the new behavior?

(if this is a breaking or feature change)

What is the current behavior?

(if this is a breaking or feature change)

What libraries were added/updated?

(list all with version changes)

Does this change affect performance?

(if so describe the impacts positive or negative)

Does this change affect security?

(if so describe the impacts positive or negative)

What alternative approaches were there?

(briefly list any if applicable)

What feature flags were used to cover this change?

(briefly list any if applicable)

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

(check only one)

  • Yes, and covered entirely by feature flag(s)
  • Yes, and covered partially by feature flag(s)
  • No
  • Not sure (briefly explain the situation below)

What level of testing was included in the change?

(check all that apply)

  • e2e
  • integration
  • unit

Which logical domain(s) does this change affect?

(for bug fixes/features, be as precise as possible. ex. Authentication, Annotation History, Review Stream etc.)

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 5, 2023

Deploy Preview for heartex-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1235839
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/heartex-docs/deploys/64a5524ebb187e00088c8419

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 5, 2023

Deploy Preview for label-studio-docs-new-theme canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1235839
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/label-studio-docs-new-theme/deploys/64a5524e658835000861e7a9

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Jul 5, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (036633f) 75.59% compared to head (1235839) 75.59%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #4474   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    75.59%   75.59%           
========================================
  Files          156      156           
  Lines        12233    12233           
========================================
  Hits          9247     9247           
  Misses        2986     2986           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@triklozoid triklozoid merged commit 312a582 into develop Jul 5, 2023
37 checks passed
@jombooth jombooth deleted the fb-LSDV-5289-1 branch August 23, 2023 00:06
shayantabatabaee pushed a commit to shayantabatabaee/label-studio that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants