Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Other Organs Not Visible on Committee Page #1890

Open
BHenkemans opened this issue Aug 23, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Other Organs Not Visible on Committee Page #1890

BHenkemans opened this issue Aug 23, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@BHenkemans
Copy link
Contributor

What would you like?

Currently, "other organs" (RvA, KCCs, and AVWs) are not visible on the committee page. However, some people may want to get information about these organs (for instance, to contact the organ or one of their members). The only way to do this right now is to guess someone in that organ and use the link of that organ on their member page.

Why is this needed?

The current method makes it difficult to find these organs if you don't know anyone in the body.

Other information

No response

@BHenkemans
Copy link
Contributor Author

BHenkemans commented Aug 23, 2024

I suggest making another page or a tab on the current committee page if making a distinction is even desirable. For "regular" members, this distinction is not relevant.

@tomudding
Copy link
Member

The avc|kcc|avw|rva are relatively new; see GH-1057. Before that, everything was grouped under avc (not that you could view those). The other types do not appear under the Committees section, as it logically follows that committee is a specific type and not also an umbrella for avc|kcc|avw|rva.

I am firmly against adding another entry to the navbar. As such, there are two probable solutions: We can either consolidate all "organs" into one navbar entry and have a submenu for each "flavour" or have a nav-pill bar on the committees page, similar to how we allow filtering on meeting types. However, I also do not like these two options either.

@BHenkemans
Copy link
Contributor Author

However, I also do not like these two options either.

Would it hurt to pretend that these are "just regular committees"? As I mentioned before, for most members, these are just committees. The types (in my eyes) are purely regulatory.

@tomudding
Copy link
Member

Would it hurt to pretend that these are "just regular committees"? As I mentioned before, for most members, these are just committees. The types (in my eyes) are purely regulatory.

I am getting old, so I like to complain more. I think the second option of adding a nav-pill bar is the best solution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants