-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump GEOS version to 1.5.1 #300
Comments
I can only speak of C90-0.66 deg coupled setup with the latest CICE6. There appears a polar cool down in the v11.5.1 which resulted in accumulation of thicker ice in the Arctic. The cooling happened abruptly during the first 2 years and then leveled off. In the Arctic, increasing ice volume is associated with lack of cloud forcing during the winter season. I don't know whether the above applies to c180-1440x1080 config. I don't have such a run. |
@Dooruk Please just update to v11.5.1 that's that matters for now. |
Thanks Bin, I will focus on the high-res for now with CICE4 and CICE6 setups and see if we see a similar issue. |
This is what I'm hoping for:
@Dooruk I'll close this issue for you since you have all the info. and questions have been answered. If this is |
It's time for us to update develop
GEOS
version, which is quite old at this point. This way we can also create a Tier 2 test.We have to use the
MOM_override
in this GEOS-ESM/GEOS_OceanGridComp#65 until we update to a version that encompasses that PR.According to @zhaobin74, CICE6 is ready for the high-res setup, sounds like there is an issue with the ocean heating that impacts the sea-ice growth, however. @sanAkel or @zhaobin74 could you please briefly clarify if this is a particular resolution issue, or CICE4 vs. CICE6 issue, or overall
GEOSgcm
issue? That wasn't clear to me during yesterday's meeting.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: