Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GeoReference clarification and real world relations #81

Open
heuerfin opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

GeoReference clarification and real world relations #81

heuerfin opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@heuerfin
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed today we should harmonize and clarify some things regarding the georeferencing shape:

  • Definition for BoundingBox. Should we fix the BoundingBox coordinates to a certain coordinates system? (e.g. EPSG:4326) This would make it easier to match e.g. the bounding box from a sensor trace to a map (without a transformation)
    • Should we introduce 2 BoundingBox'es: 1. for global harmonized system and 2. in the local map coordinate system
  • Introduce a switch between "real world reference" and "no real world reference": to make it clear if it is synthetic or not
@MircoNierenz
Copy link
Contributor

Do you need both bounding boxes at the same time or is an additional specification of the type of reference system enough - as mentioned as switch between ‘real world reference’ and ‘no real world reference’?

@MircoNierenz
Copy link
Contributor

see #102

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants