You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed today we should harmonize and clarify some things regarding the georeferencing shape:
Definition for BoundingBox. Should we fix the BoundingBox coordinates to a certain coordinates system? (e.g. EPSG:4326) This would make it easier to match e.g. the bounding box from a sensor trace to a map (without a transformation)
Should we introduce 2 BoundingBox'es: 1. for global harmonized system and 2. in the local map coordinate system
Introduce a switch between "real world reference" and "no real world reference": to make it clear if it is synthetic or not
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Do you need both bounding boxes at the same time or is an additional specification of the type of reference system enough - as mentioned as switch between ‘real world reference’ and ‘no real world reference’?
As discussed today we should harmonize and clarify some things regarding the georeferencing shape:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: