-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TODOS discussion 06.05.2024 #29
Comments
|
regarding This task is simple for shapes that do not reference "external" shapes. Example:
With this syntax you would be able to reference an "external" In the context of this repository we will not have access to |
incorporated first remarks from issue #29
Can the shapes also be uploaded somewhere more independend from EDC? Reference to a URL? I don't want to use custom software to access the shapes. Just a trusted source. |
Task "-> test if ontology/shacl parses successfully": |
@jdsika not sure if I understand the question. Which subtask are you referring to? Or where do we have a link to EDC in this issue / repository? |
I am sorry, I was reading this comment and may have misunderstood it? It was regarding "where" are the ontologies uploaded to in order to have a source for the validation.
|
The source for validation is the federated catalogue. Ontologies and shapes must be uploaded so the catalogue knows what an HdMap is (as an example). The validation against the shacl shape is then done in the federated catalogue when someone uploads a self description containing an HdMap. Since we now have a working (because fixed) gx ontology in our repo I will also have access to the PostalAddressShape in the context of this repo. |
Task "-> test if example .json complies with shacl property definitions (schema)": |
Participants
@robertschubert
@jtdemer
@jdsika
Decisions
Codeowners
Rename: VARAIBLES -> prefix_properties.md OR PROPERTIES.md
files and folders without capitals
prefix is always the same as the folder name
prefix names use "-" as separators
Classes PascalCase
Properties camlCase
Carlo: merge examples. Question of taste
not extra folder, just same level
everyone adding an ontology must add an example
test if ontology/shacl parses successfully
test if example .json complies with shacl property definitions (schema)
GaiaX definitions are provided as json and not as a repo
we add an extra folder to the repo named e.g. "gaiax" with a readme and original json plus pthon converter to .ttl
token meta data
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: