Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the possibility to replace the identicon with the sample's icon #669

Open
1 of 4 tasks
jvoisin opened this issue Sep 12, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 4 tasks

Add the possibility to replace the identicon with the sample's icon #669

jvoisin opened this issue Sep 12, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
type:feature New feature description e.g. which involves implementation of new components zone:backend MWDB backend core related tasks zone:frontend MWDB frontend tasks

Comments

@jvoisin
Copy link
Contributor

jvoisin commented Sep 12, 2022

Feature Category

  • Correctness
  • User Interface / User Experience
  • Performance
  • Other (please explain)

Describe the problem

Having identicon is nice and dandy, but it would be more useful in certain cases to have the app's icon instead, like for Android Applications, where stalkerware families usually use a single icon, making it obvious what samples belong to what family.

Describe the solution you'd like

Being able to use the app's icon instead of the identicon. Maybe a simple boolean per sample or something like this

Describe alternatives you've considered

Do it the virustotal way, and store a hash (main_icon_dhash) of the picture.

@KWMORALE KWMORALE added type:feature New feature description e.g. which involves implementation of new components zone:backend MWDB backend core related tasks zone:frontend MWDB frontend tasks labels Oct 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:feature New feature description e.g. which involves implementation of new components zone:backend MWDB backend core related tasks zone:frontend MWDB frontend tasks
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants