Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate L100_Instance1.xml model scenario. #5

Open
corymosiman12 opened this issue Jan 24, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Investigate L100_Instance1.xml model scenario. #5

corymosiman12 opened this issue Jan 24, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@corymosiman12
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@corymosiman12
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here is results file. The scenario is as such:

Premises Name L100_Instance1
Location 233 S Wacker Dr, Chicago IL 60606
Description This is based on the RetailStandalone prototype as the first floor. The second floor is the same footprint as the first but assuming it is a MediumOffice space. Address used is for Willis Tower building
Floor Area 49,390 (24,695 each floor)

When Translator goes through and populates the the second floor, the layout of the zoning looks ok:
image

For the first floor Retail part, however, we get some really skinny weird zones:
image

So, what I want to investigate is:

  1. Whether that behaviour for the Retail space is expected (based on model-articulation gem and bar methods)?
  2. How bar works...cause if the square footage is the same as the RetailStandalone prototype, I would at least expect the number of thermal zones to match (RetailStandalone prototype = 5 zones, this model = 18 zones in the RetailStandalone portion (i.e. first floor))
  3. If this type of behaviour is expected, is this what we want to have happen? Maybe for our use case it's ok, but it seems non-ideal to me...just my opinion though.

Results and osm attached for reference.

in.osm.zip
openstudio_results_report.html.zip

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants